新媒网 · 跨境数据社区

Dear Congress…Enough is enough. You habitually pass massive bills that no one reads—crammed with unrelated policies and backroom deals. You’re no longer effective. We the People deserve better. And the Founders gave us the power to reform Congress: Article V of the Constitution allows the STATES to call a Convention to propose constitutional amendments—without Congress’s permission. Let’s use it to force single-issue bills—so every law gets a fair debate and nothing gets buried. We can’t sit back and hope for change. We must demand it. Join the movement and help bring accountability back to Washington. One issue. One bill. One vote. It’s that simple. Will you chip in $10 today to help us call the convention?

If your business overpays taxes, you shouldn’t have to beg to get it back. As a Republican, I’ll make faster refunds a top priority, because the people funding government shouldn’t be treated like second-class citizens. Government should serve you, not stall you.

Too many Pennsylvanians are worried about our election system and the security of our democracy. We've seen far too many election issues across our commonwealth—even during the 2024 election. Trust in our democracy is on the line. That's why Pennsylvania should require a state ID to vote. Safe, secure elections are the foundation of a strong democracy. Requiring a state ID to vote in Pennsylvania elections will restore confidence in our election process.

The Conservative record in Cambridgeshire speaks for itself: 🛣️ A £650+ million backlog in road repairs left to pile up — leaving us with crumbling, dangerous roads. 🏥 Our NHS local NHS starved of funding, leaving us with the lowest spending per head on GPs in the entire country. 💩 Raw sewage being dumped into our rivers, while water company bosses pocket record bonuses. 🔊Local voices continually ignored across our communities. The Conservatives have failed us — and they’ve shown time and again they simply don’t care about Cambridgeshire. ✅ It's time for change. Click above to find out how your vote can help beat them for good and deliver real change.

We need a fairer voting system where all votes count equally. Will you sign the petition?

💭 We want to hear from YOU - how would you stop reckless spending and make the government more efficient? South Africa’s bloated GNU Cabinet costs you, the taxpayer, R1.3 billion a year. ActionSA is tackling this wastage head-on with two proposed bold and exciting reforms - Cabinet Reform Package and the Zero-Tolerance Corruption Bill. As part of our Cabinet Reform Package, we will table a Constitutional Amendment to Abolish Deputy Ministers entirely from the Cabinet, and the Cut Cabinet Perks Bill to drastically reduce excessive Ministerial allowances and perks. The proposed Zero-Tolerance Corruption Bill is aimed at strengthening the fight against corruption and holding perpetrators to account. What do YOU think? Share your ideas in the comments section below!

In 2018 and 2022, Ford's PCs won a "majority" government with about 40% of the vote. 40% of the vote shouldn't equal 100% of the power! Sign the petition to the leaders of the Ontario Liberals, NDP and Green Parties asking them to push for proportional representation.

It’s time to replace the House of Lords with a House of Citizens. Free from party politics, we can trust a House of Citizens to put people first in parliament.

It’s time to replace the House of Lords with a House of Citizens. Free from party politics, we can trust a House of Citizens to put people first in parliament.

Pragul Electoral la 3%: Cum rupem cercul vicios al puterii politice confiscate Parlamentul este esența democrației. Este locul unde poporul își trimite reprezentanții, unde se decid legile și politicile care ne influențează viața de zi cu zi. Însă ce vedem astăzi? Un parlament în care „multă lume, puțini oameni,” vorba lui Nicolae Iorga. Instituția care ar trebui să fie expresia voinței poporului a devenit, în realitate, un club închis, dominat de câteva partide mari care și-au consolidat monopolul puterii. Cum au făcut asta? Prin ridicarea pragului electoral la 5%. Un simplu artificiu legislativ care a anulat orice șansă reală pentru partidele mici de a accede în parlament. Sub pretextul „stabilității guvernamentale,” partidele mari au construit un sistem care le avantajează exclusiv pe ele. Pragul ridicat a transformat politica într-un joc al supraviețuirii, în care doar cei mari și conectați pot rezista. De ce 5% este o barieră toxică? Ridicarea pragului electoral a fost justificată cu argumentul că avem nevoie de majorități stabile, capabile să ia decizii grele pentru țară. Dar realitatea ne-a arătat altceva: aceste majorități au fost folosite doar pentru a le asigura confortul celor aflați la putere. „Ciocul mic, suntem la putere!” este replica spusă de o „distinsă” doamnă deputat. Pragul de 5% a distrus diversitatea politică. Ne uităm în parlament și vedem aceleași fețe, aceleași partide, aceleași interese. Nu există competiție reală, nu există o selecție riguroasă a candidaților. În schimb, locurile sunt ocupate de oameni fără competențe, dar cu relații de familie sau prietenii care le garantează pozițiile. De câte ori am văzut familii întregi pe listele electorale? Mai grav, acest sistem a transformat parlamentul într-un loc unde doar partidele mari decid. Partidele mici, care ar putea reprezenta interese punctuale sau segmente specifice ale societății, nu au nicio șansă să acceadă. Ce se întâmplă dacă pragul scade la 3%? Reducerea pragului electoral la 3% ar schimba radical jocul politic. Ar permite partidelor mici să intre în parlament și să aducă un suflu nou. Aceste partide, de obicei axate pe domenii clare, cum ar fi educația, sănătatea sau economia, au membri care sunt de multe ori mai competenți decât cei din partidele mari. Intrarea mai multor partide în parlament ar obliga toate formațiunile politice să își selecteze candidații cu mai multă grijă. Nu ar mai putea să promoveze pe oricine, pentru că presiunea competiției ar deveni reală. Impactul asupra actului guvernamental 1. Negocieri reale: Un parlament cu mai multe partide ar însemna negocieri autentice pentru formarea majorităților. Nu s-ar mai putea forma guverne peste noapte, fără transparență. 2. Responsabilitate crescută: Guvernele nu ar mai avea majorități confortabile în Parlament, ceea ce le-ar obliga să respecte programul de guvernare și să ia măsuri în interes public. 3. Transparență: Fiecare decizie ar trebui argumentată și supusă dezbaterii, crescând calitatea legilor și a măsurilor adoptate. Cine se teme de un prag mai mic? Partidele mari se opun vehement unei asemenea măsuri. De ce? Pentru că le-ar distruge monopolul. Știu că, într-un sistem cu mai multe partide, vor pierde din influență. Nu vor mai putea să conducă discreționar, să impună oameni incompetenți pe liste sau să ignore nevoile reale ale societății. Ce câștigăm cu pragul electoral de 3%? 1. Un parlament mai reprezentativ: Segmente ale populației care acum nu au voce ar putea să fie reprezentate. 2. Calitate mai bună a legilor: Mai mulți oameni competenți în parlament înseamnă legi mai bine gândite. 3. Un guvern sub control parlamentar: Fără majorități confortabile, guvernul ar fi obligat să colaboreze și să respecte voința parlamentului. 4. Reformarea partidelor mari: Sub presiunea competiției, partidele mari ar fi forțate să își reformeze structurile și să promoveze oameni mai bine pregătiți. 5. Un președinte sub control parlamentar: Activitatea președintelui ar putea fi pusă mai ușor sub controlul Parlamentului, eliminând riscul derapajelor constituționale. Suspendarea sa, dacă necesară, ar deveni mai accesibilă printr-un sistem politic diversificat. 6. Separarea reală a puterilor în stat: Măsura ar contribui la întărirea separației puterilor în stat, conform Constituției, printr-un control reciproc autentic între legislativ, executiv și judiciar. Acesta ar fi un câștig esențial pentru democrație. De ce e nevoie de un președinte care își dorește reformarea statului? Actualele partide nu vor modifica singure legea. Au tot interesul să mențină status quo-ul și să păstreze pragul de 5%. Este nevoie de un președinte care să forțeze această schimbare, să pună presiune publică și să mobilizeze cetățenii. Stabilitatea cu care ne-au mințit până acum ne-a adus în pragul falimentului. E timpul să schimbăm regulile jocului. România are nevoie de o clasă politică nouă, de oameni care să vină cu soluții reale, nu cu promisiuni goale. Iar primul pas pentru asta este scăderea pragului electoral la 3%. Ce urmează? Următorul text va explica detaliat cum pragul electoral de 3% va schimba dinamica politică și ce beneficii concrete vom avea ca națiune. Ridică-te, Românie!

Last year South Carolina legislators spent $400 MILLION in pork projects. It's time to put an end to wasteful spending and give YOU back what you earn. Repealing the state income tax is the first step toward real change! Join the movement today—SIGN THE PETITION to make your voice heard. Let’s demand accountability and fight for our financial freedom!

🎙️ Inequality and unfairness will always exist. The key is removing it from the process. A few weeks ago, during a talkshow, I heard a prominent political leader say that their kids would have advantages in their constituencies due to their family’s goodwill. People will support them simply because they’re the children of someone “loved & well-known.” I get it. Life’s not fair. Sometimes I wish I looked like Brad Pitt or was the son of an Arab Sheikh. These things come with undeniable privileges. So yes, a kid from a renowned political family has built-in privileges: 🔹 Legacy & Connections – Being the child of a prominent figure means inheriting their legacy. Imagine Sachin’s son batting or CR7’s kid doing the “Siuuu!” People will instantly connect with that. 🔹 Access to Power – These kids aren’t just hearing about political giants like Khaleda Zia—they dine with them. Just like junior Bush followed his father’s footsteps. ❓ But how do we know they’re really better than the others, or are we denying ourselves a new great leadership journey? That’s my biggest concern. We often see kids rising in politics, business etc, but how many excel in sports following their parents’ footsteps? Not many. Because sports is the most merit-based field. It doesn’t care about family names—if you're good, you're good 🔥 Here’s what I believe we need: 👉 Transparency – Political parties must have clear, fair processes to ensure family ties don’t unduly influence nominations. 👉 Youth Engagement – Encourage young people from all backgrounds to join politics through mentorship and leadership programs. 👉 Education & Debates – The public must learn to judge candidates based on merit, not just family name. Let the best candidates prove themselves through fair debates and contest. This is the new Bangladesh we fought for in 2024. Inequality will always exist in human psychology, but by removing it from the process, we can move closer to true equality 🇧🇩🚀 #meritocracy #leadership #youthempowerment #bangladesh2025

🎙️ Inequality and unfairness will always exist. The key is removing it from the process. A few weeks ago, during a talkshow, I heard a prominent political leader say that their kids would have advantages in their constituencies due to their family’s goodwill. People will support them simply because they’re the children of someone “loved & well-known.” I get it. Life’s not fair. Sometimes I wish I looked like Brad Pitt or was the son of an Arab Sheikh. These things come with undeniable privileges. So yes, a kid from a renowned political family has built-in privileges: 🔹 Legacy & Connections – Being the child of a prominent figure means inheriting their legacy. Imagine Sachin’s son batting or CR7’s kid doing the “Siuuu!” People will instantly connect with that. 🔹 Access to Power – These kids aren’t just hearing about political giants like Khaleda Zia—they dine with them. Just like junior Bush followed his father’s footsteps. ❓ But how do we know they’re really better than the others, or are we denying ourselves a new great leadership journey? That’s my biggest concern. We often see kids rising in politics, business etc, but how many excel in sports following their parents’ footsteps? Not many. Because sports is the most merit-based field. It doesn’t care about family names—if you're good, you're good 🔥 Here’s what I believe we need: 👉 Transparency – Political parties must have clear, fair processes to ensure family ties don’t unduly influence nominations. 👉 Youth Engagement – Encourage young people from all backgrounds to join politics through mentorship and leadership programs. 👉 Education & Debates – The public must learn to judge candidates based on merit, not just family name. Let the best candidates prove themselves through fair debates and contest. This is the new Bangladesh we fought for in 2024. Inequality will always exist in human psychology, but by removing it from the process, we can move closer to true equality 🇧🇩🚀 #meritocracy #leadership #youthempowerment #bangladesh2025

Time for the government to listen. We need a system where every vote matters. Add your name below.

If democracy cannot be treated like democracy, then the rule of law will not be upheld. We advocate for human rights but violate them. 🎯 The time to change the global narrative is now. Join us in delivering proper global governance that serves everyone equally.

@andrewyang on the benefits of #RCV - - #rcvact #electionreform #DemocracyReform #ElectionReform #VoteSmarter #ProportionalRepresentation #BetterElections #InstantRunoffVoting #RCVforAll #RankedVoting #ElectoralReform #VoterEmpowerment #RankedChoice #RCVExplained #VotingRights #ElectionIntegrity #RankedVotingWorks #RankedChoiceNow #RCVSupport #RCVAdvocacy #RCVAct #MakeVotesCount #andrewyang #yang

In 2018 and 2022, first-past-the-post delivered Ford’s PCs 100% of the power with just 40% of the vote, shutting the majority of voters out of decisions that affect their lives. Tell the Ontario Liberal, NDP and Green Party leaders to put proportional representation front and centre in their election platforms! SIGN THE PETITION HERE:

In 2018 and 2022, first-past-the-post delivered Ford’s PCs 100% of the power with just 40% of the vote, shutting the majority of voters out of decisions that affect their lives. Tell the Ontario Liberal, NDP and Green Party leaders to put proportional representation front and centre in their election platforms! SIGN THE PETITION HERE: